Karnataka: An uncomfortable coalition since day one and why the internal feud must be blamed
Bengaluru, July 12: The million dollar question is who is behind the Karnataka crisis. The issue has dragged on and the Speaker is yet to take a call on the resignation of the rebel MLAs.
In the interim all parties have thrown barbs at each other accusing each one of engineering the crisis. The BJP says that it is an internal feud within the JD(S) and Congress that is playing out. The ruling coalition however blames the BJP for carrying out Operation Lotus.
The fact of the matter is that the coalition was an uncomfortable one since day one. The Congress and JD(S) are not natural allies. Every time they have tried coming together, they have not survived long. There was an alliance between the two parties in 2004, when the JD(S) extended support to the Congress and made N Dharam Singh the chief minister. However the coalition lasted barely two years and a JD(S)-BJP government came into existence.
Further, if one looks at the politics on the ground level, the workers of the two parties have never been on the same page. Both parties share a common vote bank and the workers of the two parties are extremely suspicious of each other. The recently held Lok Sabha elections is proof of the same and the losses especially at Mandya and Mysuru is a clear indication that the alliance chemistry has not translated to the ground.
JD(S) minister, BJP leaders meeting sets off speculations; Both dismiss any significance
In
the
current
scenario,
one
must
also
bear
in
mind
the
Siddaramaiah
factor.
A
hardcore
JD(S)
man,
he
quit
the
party
to
join
the
Congress
in
2006.
It
was
clear
back
then
he
did
not
favour
Deve
Gowda
giving
more
importance
to
his
sons.
He
was
well
aware
that
he
would
not
be
able
to
nurture
his
chief
ministerial
dreams
if
he
stayed
on
in
the
JD(S).
Siddaramaiah
did
fight
it
out
and
in
2013
lead
the
Congress
to
an
impressive
victory.
An
outsider,
within
the
Congress,
he
managed
to
take
over
the
top
post
and
ruled
the
state
of
Karnataka
for
5
years.
The 2018 elections ended up with a hung verdict, with the BJP leading the pack with 105 seats. To keep the BJP at bay, the Congress quickly offered the JD(S) the CM post and entered into an alliance. However there was one man who was clearly unhappy and that was Siddaramaiah. First and foremost, he had to give up the seat to the Gowda family, who are his sworn rivals.
Since day one there have been problems within the Congress. There have been many statements from Siddaramaiah loyalists asking them to make him the chief minister. Siddaramaiah himself has hinted that he could become CM again. There is a slight bit of suspicion that Siddaramaiah could be behind the crisis as many of his loyalists too have tendered their resignation. The man himself however denies it and said that he cannot reply to rumours.
Siddaramaiah has had several meetings with the high command, explaining how this coalition is only hurting the party. In June he had met with Rahul Gandhi and explained that they either pull out of the coalition or tilt the power balance in their favour. He felt that the Congress with 79 MLAs had given the JD(S) too much despite the party having just 37.
Karnataka crisis lives on another day: All action shifts to legislative session, Supreme Court
He has also explained that the workers on the ground are clearly unhappy and this was reflected in the recent electoral drubbing that both parties got in the recently concluded Lok Sabha elections. Both parties won just one seat each, while the BJP ended up 25 in Karnataka.
The issue relating to Siddaramaiah had cropped up even during a discussion between D K Shivakumar and Deve Gowda. During that meeting, Gowda clearly blamed Siddaramaiah for the crisis and said that he was nurturing chief ministerial aspirations. To this, Shivakumar replied stating that if they could make Siddaramaiah the CM and save the government, they must explore the possibility. Gowda, however put his foot down and said that if that were to be the case, then he would pull out of the government.