• search
For Quick Alerts
ALLOW NOTIFICATIONS  
For Daily Alerts

In Ayodhya verdict, a 116-page note on Valmiki Ramayana, Skanda Purana

|

New Delhi, Nov 09: The Supreme Court on Saturday pronounced its 1045-page judgment in the historic Ayodhya dispute. Interestingly, the verdict was followed by a 116-page addendum over whether the disputed structure is the holy birthplace of Lord Ram as per the faith, belief and trust of the Hindus.

Ayodhya

While delivering the Ayodhya Verdict in which the top court ordered that the disputed land be given to the Hindus, the judge opined that the "faith and belief of Hindus" that the Lord Ram's birth place "is the place where Babri Mosque has been constructed" is "proved by documentary and oral evidence discussed above".

The judge, who was not named, referred to numerous oral statements, references to the birth place in gazettes and even "scriptures and sacred religious books including Valmiki Ramayana and Skanda Purana, which faith and beliefs, cannot be held to be groundless".

Ayodhya verdict: A timeline since 1528

Ranjan Gogoi, without specifying the name, said one of the judges, while being in agreement with the reasons and directions, has recorded separate reasons on "whether the disputed structure is the birthplace of Lord Ram according to the faith and belief of the Hindu devotees?'

"There is no evidence worth name led of the plaintiffs of Suit No.4 (Sunni Central Waqf Board and 9 Muslim residents of Ayodhya) to disprove the above statement and further, oral evidence as noticed above clearly supports the faith and belief of Hindus that Lord Ram was born at the place where Babri Mosque has been constructed. The conclusion that place of birth of Lord Ram is the three dome structure can, therefore, be reached," the judge said in the 116-page 'addendum'.

The 'addendum' referred to accounts of various historians, gazetteers, travelogues as well as verses from religious books, including Valmiki Ramayana, Skanda Purana and Rama Charita Manas.

The court said that in the period prior to 1528 AD, there were sufficient religious texts, which led the Hindus to believe the site of Ram Janmabhoomi to the birthplace of Lord Ram. It said faith and belief of the Hindus, as depicted by the evidence on record, clearly establish that the Hindus belief that at the birthplace of Lord Ram, the mosque was constructed and three-dome structure is the birth place of the deity.

"The fact that Hindus were by constructing iron wall, dividing mosque premises, kept outside the three-dome structure cannot be said to alter their faith and belief regarding the birthplace of Lord Ram. The worship on the Ram Chabutra in the outer courtyard was symbolic worship of Lord Ram who was believed to be born in the premises," it said.

The court concluded that "faith and belief of Hindus since prior to construction of mosque and subsequent thereto has always been that Janmasthan of Lord Ram is the place where Babri Mosque has been constructed which faith and belief is proved by documentary and oral evidence".

The court said the statements noted in all gazetteers, published under authority of government, categorically and unanimously state that at Janmasthan of Lord Ram, Babri Mosque was constructed in 1528 by Emperor Babur.

It is true that statements recorded in Gazette is not conclusive evidence but presumption of correctness of statements recorded have to be raised subject to being disproved by leading appropriate evidences, it added. The court said the sequence of events clearly indicate that faith and belief of Hindus was that birthplace of Lord Ram was in the three-dome structure Mosque which was constructed at the Janmasthan.

"It was only during the British period that grilled wall was constructed dividing the walled premises of the Mosque into inner courtyard and outer courtyard. Grilled iron wall was constructed to keep Hindus outside the grilled iron wall in the outer courtyard. "In view of the construction of the iron wall, the worship and puja started in Ram Chabutra in the outer courtyard," it said.

In a historic verdict, the top court ruled that this land will continue to remain in the statutory receiver under the central government till the government comes up with a scheme to set up a trust and a formal order is issued. Simultaneously, the court ruled, a suitable plot of land measuring 5 acres should be handed over to the Sunni Central Waqf Board.

For Daily Alerts
Get Instant News Updates
Enable
x
Notification Settings X
Time Settings
Done
Clear Notification X
Do you want to clear all the notifications from your inbox?
Settings X
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. This includes cookies from third party social media websites and ad networks. Such third party cookies may track your use on Oneindia sites for better rendering. Our partners use cookies to ensure we show you advertising that is relevant to you. If you continue without changing your settings, we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies on Oneindia website. However, you can change your cookie settings at any time. Learn more