Four Temporary Rural Development Officials Terminated in Reasi Over Corruption Allegations
In Reasi, four temporary officials from the rural development department were terminated for corruption, including record manipulation and fund misappropriation under MGNREGA and the Swachh Bharat Mission. The inquiry revealed significant irregularities in job card issuance and project expenditures.
Reasi Deputy Commissioner Nidhi Malik has terminated four temporary officials from the rural development department. This decision came after an inquiry revealed their involvement in record manipulation and embezzlement of government funds. The investigation, led by Additional District Development Commissioner Sukhdev Singh, focused on violations related to the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) and the Swachh Bharat Mission (SBM), according to an official spokesperson.

AI-generated summary, reviewed by editors
In the Jij Bagli block, gram rozgar sevak Mohammad Latief and technical assistant Rahil Magotra were implicated in record tampering. They issued fake and duplicate job cards and irregularly sanctioned individual household latrine units (IHHL). Both were also found guilty of misappropriating funds under MGNREGA, as noted in the social audit report.
Irregularities in Chassana Block
In Chassana block, gram rozgar sevak Abdul Qayoom and technical assistant Arun Gandotra faced allegations of irregularities under the Swachh Bharat Mission. The inquiry revealed discrepancies in records showing a Rs 3 lakh expenditure on a Community Sanitary Complex in Chassana-A panchayat. However, the structure was missing during the social audit.
The deputy commissioner has also advised strict measures against permanent officials who served during this period. This includes block development officers of Chassana and Jij Bagli, assistant executive engineers, junior engineers, and panchayat secretaries. She has urged for recovery proceedings under Jammu and Kashmir Civil Services Classification, Control and Appeal Rules, 1956.
Ensuring Accountability
The aim is to enforce accountability and prevent future malpractices. The inquiry's findings underscore the need for stringent oversight in implementing government schemes. By holding those responsible accountable, authorities hope to deter similar misconduct in the future.
This action highlights the importance of transparency and integrity in public service. It serves as a reminder that any deviation from ethical standards will be met with appropriate consequences to maintain public trust.
With inputs from PTI
-
Gold Silver Rate Today, 9 March 2026: City-Wise Prices, MCX Gold and Silver Ease Slightly After Rally -
Bangalore Gold Silver Rate Today, March 9, 2026: Gold and Silver Prices Fall as US Dollar Strengthens -
Vijay-NDA Alliance On Cards? Pawan Kalyan Reportedly Reaches Out to TVK Chief -
Who Was Mojtaba Khamenei’s Wife Zahra Haddad-Adel and What Do We Know About Her? -
Who Is Aditi Hundia? Viral ‘Girl in Red’ & Ishan Kishan's Girlfriend Spotted During IND vs NZ Final -
Hyderabad Gold Silver Rate Today, 9 March 2026: Latest 24K, 22K Gold And Silver Rates In City -
Kerala Election 2026 Date: When Can You Expect EC To Announce Key Dates of Voting & Counting? -
Chennai MRTS Velachery–St Thomas Mount Line Opening on March 10 Faces Delay; Direct Beach Route to Start Later -
Mumbai Water Supply Cut For 24 Hours: Check Dates, Timings & Areas Affected by BMC Maintenance Disruption -
Hardik Pandya and Girlfriend Mahieka Sharma’s Celebration Video Goes Viral After India’s Win -
Bengaluru Hotels to Shut From Tomorrow March 10 as Commercial LPG Supply Stops -
Trisha's Net Worth: How Rich Is Thalapathy Vijay's Rumoured Girlfriend?












Click it and Unblock the Notifications