Get Updates
Get notified of breaking news, exclusive insights, and must-see stories!

‘Economic Loss And Harassment’: HC Demands Centre Explain Airfare Spike During IndiGo Chaos

The Delhi High Court on Wednesday raised serious concerns with the Centre and relevant authorities over the sharp surge in airfares during the recent IndiGo flight disruptions, which impacted lakhs of passengers nationwide. The Bench questioned how some airlines were able to charge fares as high as ₹40,000 for tickets that typically cost around ₹5,000.

"If there was a crisis, how could other airlines take advantage? How can fares jump to ₹35,000-₹39,000? How could other carriers start charging these amounts? How can this happen?" the Court asked.

AI Summary

AI-generated summary, reviewed by editors

The Delhi High Court expressed concerns to the Centre regarding the significant increase in airfares during recent IndiGo flight disruptions, questioning fares as high as ₹40,000.The court also inquired about passenger compensation and responsible airline conduct related to the disruptions.
Economic Loss And Harassment HC Demands Centre Explain Airfare Spike During IndiGo Chaos

In response, Additional Solicitor General Chetan Sharma, representing the government, stated that the "statutory mechanism is totally in place" and referred to the relevant documents during the hearing. He explained that the Centre had been planning to implement the FDTL (Fare Differential Ticketing Limit) for some time, but IndiGo had requested extensions for both the July and November phases before the single judge.

"This is the first time the Ministry has intervened. We have capped the fares; this cap itself is a stringent regulatory action," the ASG submitted.

Court Questions Centre on Passenger Compensation and Airline Conduct

The Bench further questioned the government on the measures taken during the flight disruptions, asking how it ensures that airlines "behave responsibly."

"What action has been taken to compensate passengers? How are you ensuring that airline staff behave responsibly?" the Court observed, noting that the issue goes beyond mere inconvenience and also involves economic loss and systemic failures.

The Court also sought clarification on how such a situation could arise over time and what steps had been taken to assist affected passengers.

"Why did such a situation even precipitate? What steps were taken to assist passengers?" the Bench asked, directing the Centre to explain the arrangements made to manage stranded travellers and prevent harassment at airports.

Notifications
Settings
Clear Notifications
Notifications
Use the toggle to switch on notifications
  • Block for 8 hours
  • Block for 12 hours
  • Block for 24 hours
  • Don't block
Gender
Select your Gender
  • Male
  • Female
  • Others
Age
Select your Age Range
  • Under 18
  • 18 to 25
  • 26 to 35
  • 36 to 45
  • 45 to 55
  • 55+