For Quick Alerts
For Daily Alerts
Ayodhya Verdict updates: Hindus get Ayodhya Land, Muslims to get alternate site
New Delhi, Nov 08: The Supreme Court today held that the Hindus would get the disputed site at Ayodhya while the Muslims would be given alternate land of 5 acres.
The court further said that the Centre shall set up a trust in 3 months to build a temple.
Here is how it all unfolded in the Supreme Court
Newest First Oldest First
Prohibitory orders have been issued across Delhi to maintain public order.
Prohibitory orders have been issued across Delhi to maintain public order.#AYODHYAVERDICT #AyodhyaCase #AyodhyaJudgment
— Delhi Police (@DelhiPolice) November 9, 2019
In a nutshell:
Hindus to get land subject to conditions
Central government to frame a scheme
A trust will be formed
Inner courtyard will be handed over to the trust
A suitable plot of land measuring 5 acre shall be given to Sunni Waqf Board
Centre must set a trust with board of trustees within 3 months
A suitable plot of land measuring 5 acre shall be given to Sunni Waqf Board either by the state or by the Centre.
Under Article 142, SC directs in the scheme to be framed, Nirmohi Akhara to also get representation.
Land to remain vested in statutory receiver till trust is formed
Trust to be formed in three months
Management of construction of the temple to be monitored by the trust
The riots of 1934 and disturbances in 1949 show possession of the inner court yard was a matter of contestation. Documents prior to 1857 show that Hindus were not barred from worshipping in the inner court yard. The railings segregating the outer and inner courtyard was made in 1857. But Hindus always believed that the birthplace of Ram was in the inner courtyard of the mosque, the court said.
ASI report held that there was a structure underneath the Babri Masjid can't be dismissed as conjecture or just a guess work and junks theory of pre-existence of an Idgah at the disputed site. “Babri mosque wasn't constructed on a vacant land. An underlying structure did exist. Underlying structure was not of Islamic religion as artefacts, architectural evidence had distinct non Islamic nature. ASI report can be lent credence to the underlying structure was dated 12th century. However it said ASI also said that the structure was not a specific temple.
READ MORE
Comments