Record number of Custodial death in Maharastra puts State Government in dock
The recent NCRB report suggests that autopsies were conducted on all 35 people who died in police custody in 2013. Magisterial inquiries were set up in five instances and cases registered in two. But no policemen have so far been charge-sheeted or convicted in this connection.
297
cases
in
10
years
As
per
the
report,
second
in
this
ignominious
category
are
Tamil
Nadu
and
Uttar
Pradesh
with
15
custodial
deaths
each
followed
by
Gujarat
with
13
deaths.
This
is
not
the
first
time
Maharashtra
tops
the
notorious
list.
But,
past
NCRB
reports
clearly
mentioned
that
the
State
had
the
most
custodial
deaths
of
all
Indian
States
in
10
of
the
13
years
since
2001.
Of
the
1,242
custodial
deaths
recorded
from
2000
to
2011,
297
was
reported
from
Maharashtra.
In
2010,
the
figure
was
23.
The
tally
rose
to
35
in
2011
and
dropped
to
24
the
year
after.
Number
of
custodial
deaths
in
the
State
in
2007,
2008
and
2009
are
21,
25
and
23,
respectively.
The issue of custodial deaths has, in the recent past, cast a dark cloud on the law enforcers in the State. Agnelo Valdaris, was picked up along with three others by the Wadala railway police on April 15, 2014, from the Reay Road area, for allegedly stealing a gold chain. Three days later, the 25-year-old died and the police said he was run over by a local train while trying to escape. Akash, an accused in a murder case which took place on April 17 this year, surrendered to the Samta Nagar police station in Kandivali on April 19. But he died on the 22nd. Families in both the cases are crying foul and demanding inquiry. These are few instances in the long list of custodial deaths in the State.
What are the reasons?
Experts blame strict or harsher ways of police investigation for the increase in custodial deaths in Maharashtra. They say police officers depend more on the use of third-degree methods instead of scientific procedures to extract confessions.
The conviction rate over the years has remained zero.
Almost zero conviction rate in custodial death cases in the past decade has also been responsible for the custodial deaths in the State. In the past decade, only four cases of judicial inquiry have been ordered into custody deaths in the State, while just 41 FIRs and 19 charge sheets have been filed. This further encourage the policemen to practice illegal ways during interrogation of accused.
Concerned by the rising number of custodial deaths in Maharashtra, Bombay High Court last week directed the State police to form a panel to probe custodial deaths in the State. The committee has been ordered to submit a preliminary report within two weeks.
What
State
Government
has
to
say:
Maharashtra
Government
has
sought
changes
in
the
parameters
that
classify
an
incident
as
death
in
custody,
so
as
to
bring
down
the
figures.
The
home
department
believes
the
State
has
the
maximum
number
of
custodial
deaths
due
to
ambiguity
in
the
law.
Earlier
speaking
on
the
issue,
State
Home
Minister
R
R
Patil
said,
"We
are
going
to
ask
the
National
Crime
Records
Bureau
(NCRB)
to
relook
at
the
parameters
and
allow
modifications.
There
should
be
a
uniform
definition
of
custody
death.
It
cannot
vary
from
State
to
State."
Is
discrepancy
in
parameters
really
responsible?
The
State
Government
has
called
for
uniformity
of
definition
of
custodial
deaths
across
the
country.
State
Home
Minister
said
that
NCRB
report
only
pointed
to
discrepancies
in
the
laws
among
States.
In
Maharashtra,
the
number
appears
higher
as
there
is
no
segregation.
Even
the
deaths
in
prison
due
to
natural
causes
are
counted
as
custodial
deaths,
thus
taking
the
tally
up.
However,
in
several
other
States,
the
cause
of
death
is
clearly
defined
and
those
due
to
illness
or
accidents
are
not
taken
into
account.
As
per
the
NCRB
reports,
there
were
24
custodial
deaths
in
Maharashtra
in
2012.
Of
these,
four
were
suicides,
13
due
to
illness,
six
died
in
hospitals
and
one
in
an
accident.
Certain provisions might be the reason for increase in custodial deaths in the State but at the same time lapses on part of the Government cannot be ignored. Only 14 FIRs and 19 charge sheets in 297 custodial death cases in over the decade, clearly shows the State is blatantly involved in protecting its officers. Rather than blaming the lapses in definition and pushing the cases inside carpet, the State Government should punish the real culprits.