Madhampatt­y Rangaraj Set To Undergo DNA Test To Assess Paternity Claim

The Madras High Court authorised a DNA test for the ongoing maintenance dispute between Joy Crizildaa and Madhampatty Rangaraj, illustrating how Indian courts use scientific evidence and mediation to address family conflicts. The case involves unborn child maintenance and parentage, with further hearings scheduled.

The Madras High Court allowed a DNA test on chef Madhampatty Rangaraj, moving a key dispute forward. The test related to a case involving fashion designer Joy Crizildaa and claims of marriage and parentage.

During a recent hearing before Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy, both sides filed applications supporting the DNA examination. The Court accepted these pleas and permitted the test on Madhampatty Rangaraj. This direction aimed to assist the wider proceedings already pending between the parties before judicial and mediation forums.

Madras High Court DNA test and maintenance dispute

Alongside the DNA issue, an important financial case was already before the family court. In October 2025, Joy Crizildaa sought maintenance for the unborn child and personal support from Rangaraj. Joy requested 6.50 lakh every month, stating that the sum covered rent, car EMI, medical charges, and other living expenses.

Madras High Court DNA test timeline and allegations

According to Joy Crizildaa, Rangaraj allegedly married Joy in December 2023. Joy said that Rangaraj tried to leave the relationship when Joy refused to terminate the pregnancy. On Oct 31, Joy delivered a baby boy. Joy maintained that Rangaraj carried a responsibility towards both Joy and the child.

Earlier, the dispute reached the public domain when Joy Crizildaa posted allegations on social media. Joy accused Madhampatty Rangaraj of deceiving Joy under the pretext of marriage and tagged the business entity, Madhampatty Pakashala. Feeling wronged by these posts, Madhampatty Pakashala approached the Madras High Court with legal proceedings.

Madras High Court DNA test mediation process

The Court had previously tried to resolve the matter peacefully. Former High Court judge PN Prakash was appointed as mediator to guide discussions between Joy and Rangaraj. During mediation-related hearings, counsel for Joy argued that a DNA test should establish whether Rangaraj was the biological father of the child.

Acting on instructions, counsel for Rangaraj informed the Court that Rangaraj was prepared to undergo the DNA examination. The judge then asked the parties to file proper applications supporting this step. After these filings, the Court formalised the permission and issued structured directions for conducting the test.

The Court named an Advocate Commissioner to manage the technical process with government experts. The Commissioner would coordinate with the Forensic Sciences department and the laboratory at Rajiv Gandhi Government General Hospital, Chennai. The Commissioner also received instructions to collect the final DNA report and place it before mediator PN Prakash.

After laying down these steps, the Madras High Court adjourned the matter to March 30 for further proceedings. The case highlighted how courts across India, including strong judicial systems in states like Uttar Pradesh, rely on scientific testing and structured mediation to address sensitive family disputes with care.