23 IB personnel punished in corruption cases

According to an RTI reply, necessary action including removal of service and censure was taken against an inspector, eight sub-inspectors, six assistant sub-inspectors, three head constables, five constables and a personal assistant for their involvement in illegal practices between 2001 and 2010.
A deputy superintendent of police, an inspector and three sub-inspectors were charged with corruption and later exonerated by the departmental vigilance wing, it said.
However, the IB did not give names of the officials found involved in corrupt practices citing "security reasons".
Giving details of the case registered on February 2, 2010 against a constable who demanded money from domestic and foreign tourists passing through Foreigners Check Post (FCP) Daranga for Bhutan, it said.
"The Disciplinary Authority, considering the fact that the charged officer is quite young and has a long career ahead in service, imposed major penalty of reduction in pay by two stages for a period of one year with cumulative effect".
Whereas, a sub inspector was charged for accepting "illegal gratification of Rs250 and CD cassette from a shop owner" on January 8, 2003 and "awarded penalty of withholding of one increment for a period of one year with cumulative effect".
"Name of delinquent officials is not being disclosed for security reasons," the IB said in reply to an RTI query filed by PTI.
IB, country's premier internal security agency, is responsible for gathering and dissemination of intelligence with various central and state government authorities.
"There is no case of human rights violation and sexual harassment registered against IB officials. Similarly, no other agency such as DRI, police, income tax etc have registered any case of corruption against IB officials," said KC Meena, Central Public Information Officer.
Earlier, the Central Information Commission had sought explanation from the IB for denying information on cases of corruption and sexual harassment against its officials between 2001 and 2010 under the Right to Information Act.
Following the denial of information from both the Public Information officer and First Appellate Authority, the applicant had appealed before the CIC.
PTI
-
LPG Crunch: Karnataka Brings New SOPs, Makes PNG Registration Mandatory for Businesses -
Hyderabad Gold Silver Rate Today, 30 March 2026: Check Fresh 24K, 22K, 18K Gold And Silver Prices In City -
Opinion Poll For Kerala Assembly Election 2026: Ldf Strength In Kannur And Kasaragod -
Tamil Nadu Polls 2026: Vijay Reveals Rs 645 Crore Assets, Rs 266 Crore in Banks; Know All His Declaration -
Mumbai Metro Line 9 Set for April 3 Launch, Dahisar-Mira Bhayandar to Get Direct Boost -
Trump Hints At Breakthrough With Iran Amid War Escalation, Calls Recent Move A ‘Sign Of Respect’ -
Rahul Arunoday Banerjee Autopsy Report: Actor Was Underwater For Over An Hour, Sand Found In Lungs -
West Bengal Assembly elections: Election Commission transfers heads of 173 police stations -
Delhi Weather Brings Relief: IMD Issues Yellow Alert For Rain, Thunderstorms And Gusty Winds; Check Forecast -
Tamil Nadu Elections 2026: Vijay Files Nomination Same Day as MK Stalin, Sets Up Symbolic Political Face-Off -
Too Close To Call? 57 Key Seats Could Decide West Bengal Election 2026 As TMC And BJP Gear Up For Tight Battle -
IPL 2026 RR vs CSK Live Streaming: How to Watch Rajasthan Royals vs Chennai Super Kings Match Today












Click it and Unblock the Notifications