Get Updates
Get notified of breaking news, exclusive insights, and must-see stories!

Blair faces legal challenge to halt of Saudi probe

LONDON, Dec 19 (Reuters) Anti-bribery campaigners today said they would take the British government to court over its decision to drop a corruption inquiry into dealings between Saudi Arabia and BAE Systems as part of a huge arms contract.

The legal challenge was announced as the opposition Liberal Democrats prepared a request for a debate in parliament that could force the government to publish a long-buried report about the multi-billion-dollar deal.

The Serious Fraud Office said last week it had dropped its investigation into dealings between Saudi officials and BAE representatives over the so-called Al Yamamah contract after representations from the British government about the need to safeguard national security.

Blair said he took full responsibility for stopping the investigation and that Britain's relationship with Saudi Arabia was crucial for counter-terrorism and West Asia peace.

Campaign groups The Corner House and Campaign Against Arms Trade said today the government's action was in breach of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development's Anti-Bribery Convention.

JUDICIAL REVIEW The convention came into effect in 1999 and requires signatories to classify as a crime the payment of bribes to foreign public officials in international business transactions.

''The decision was based on considerations of potential damage to relations with Saudi Arabia. This is expressly forbidden under the OECD's Anti-Bribery Convention,'' the campaign groups said in a statement.

''The advice given by the Prime Minister amounted to a direction to discontinue the investigation, which is an unlawful interference with the independence of prosecutors under domestic and international law.'' Lawyers for The Corner House and Campaign Against Arms Trade wrote to Blair, Attorney-General Lord Goldsmith and Robert Wardle, director of the Serious Fraud Office, saying the groups would formally seek a judicial review unless the government reversed its decision by Jan. 2.

Separately, the Liberal Democrats said they were finalising a demand for a vote to force the government to publish a 1992 National Audit Office (NAO) report on the Al Yamamah contract.

''It is unprecedented for the NAO to prepare a report for a committee of this house and for it not to be published. This house, if it has any integrity, will insist on the publication of that report,'' the party's parliamentary spokesman David Heath told legislators.

''There is a great danger that we are seen as a country to prosecute in the case of weak countries without oil or strategic interests and not to be prepared to continue a case in the incidence of a country which we have a strategic interest in protecting,'' he said in Parliament's last session of the year.

The original Al Yamamah deal was struck in the mid-1980s between the British and Saudi Arabia governments, when BAE was appointed the prime contractor. The Liberal Democrats said BAE and its predecessor British Aerospace had earned 43 billion pounds (.40 billion) in 20 years from the contracts.

REUTERS SY MIR KP2103

Notifications
Settings
Clear Notifications
Notifications
Use the toggle to switch on notifications
  • Block for 8 hours
  • Block for 12 hours
  • Block for 24 hours
  • Don't block
Gender
Select your Gender
  • Male
  • Female
  • Others
Age
Select your Age Range
  • Under 18
  • 18 to 25
  • 26 to 35
  • 36 to 45
  • 45 to 55
  • 55+