• search

Cauvery Disputes Tribunal in controversy again

Written by: Staff
|

New Delhi, May 10: The Cauvery Water Disputes Tribunal is once again embroiled in a controversy with the Chairman and two members clashing over the issue of taking the reports of the assessors on record.

CWDT Chairman Justice N P Singh, in his dissenting order, insisted that the Tribunal should give its final decision as early possible as the four parties to the dispute, Kerala, Karnataka, Tamil Nadu and Pondicherry, had already filed their respective affidavits/statements on April 28, following the directions of the members, Sudhir Narain and N S Rao.

The two members, in their separate majority order of the CWDT, asserted that they proposed to accept the reports submitted to the Tribunal by two of its assessors, Mr J I Gianchandani and S R Sahasrabudhe, and it was the duty of the court to supply a copy of it to the parties concerned, while the Chairman, in his different order, questioned the majority order to the Registry asking it to ''make available the copies of the reports of the assessors forthwith''.

''No such report has been submitted by the assessors which is on record or in the Registry,'' he said, adding circulation of the assessors' advice to the parties would mean that his (Chairman's) own view would be made public which should have been part of the final award.

Justice Singh said the two assessors, appointed under section 4(3) of Interstate Water Dispute Act, had the duty of 'advising' the Tribunal during the proceedings before it. The question of apportionment of waters of an inter-state river being a highly technical subject, so just to facilitate the Tribunal to appreciate different claims made by riparian States, the two assessors were giving their advice to the Tribunal on 'different aspects' of the dispute, especially on technical matters, on the basis of materials on record in different forms, including oral evidence by way of 'notes', to the Tribunal so that it could appreciate technical aspects in proper perspective.

This is not the first time the Chairman and the members are at loggerheads. On April 21 too, the Chairman and the members passed orders publicly differing over the proposal for getting the expert committee, comprising two agronomists and a meterologist, besides the two Tribunal's assessors for determining the water requirements of Cauvery Basins falling within their respective territories.

UNI

Related Stories

Cauvery Tribunal decision on expert panel on May 10

For Daily Alerts

For Breaking News from Oneindia
Get instant news updates throughout the day.

Notification Settings X
Time Settings
Done
Clear Notification X
Do you want to clear all the notifications from your inbox?
Settings X
X
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. This includes cookies from third party social media websites and ad networks. Such third party cookies may track your use on Oneindia sites for better rendering. Our partners use cookies to ensure we show you advertising that is relevant to you. If you continue without changing your settings, we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies on Oneindia website. However, you can change your cookie settings at any time. Learn more