Reservation for Marathas: Is it legally tenable?
Mumbai, Dec 1: The decision by the Maharashtra government to grant 16 per cent quota to the Maratha community will be up for a legal challenge. The question is whether this grant has taken the reservation beyond the Supreme Court mandated 50 per cent ceiling in 1992.

As things stand, the state currently has a 52 per cent quota and the additional 2 per cent was introduced in 1994 in which the Gowari tribes were included as special backward class. If one were to add the new amendment for Marathas the reservation in jobs and education in the state touches 68 per cent.
The 1992 judgment of the Supreme Court which capped the reservation at 50 per cent, said that a hike can be allowed only in case of an extraordinary and exceptional circumstance. The state of Maharashtra would now have to demonstrate in court that the decision was taken under an exceptional circumstance.
The state of Maharashtra justified the reservation on the basis of the Backward Class Commission report. The report which is not yet been made public had conducted various surveys to identify social and educational status of the Maratha community. While the state government may use this report to justify its decision, the problem however lies in the fact that the caste census figures have not been made public as yet.
In the Bill the state has sought to justify the hike on the grounds that the overall backward population in the state is now at 85 per cent. Further while terming the amendment as exceptional, the government also said that if the Marathas who comprise 30 per cent of the state's population are accommodated within the existing OBC quota, it could lead to unwarranted repercussions in the harmonious co-existence of the state.
Those who propose to challenge this move would also cite what Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar said in the constituent assembly. He had said act even if the backward class population is over 70 per cent or more, the reservation quota cannot exceed 50 per cent.
The Maharashtra government on the other hand says that when it had moved the Supreme Court to protect the earlier ordinance, it was told that the backwardness for a community can only be decided by the Backward Class Commission. It was following this that the commission was formed, which in turn said that the Marathas are backward and deserve reservation.
The most likely challenge would come from the Other Backward Class groups. They would be wary of the fact that the new law may dilute their quota.
-
India vs New Zealand T20 World Cup 2026 Final: Five Positive Signs Favouring India Before Title Clash -
IND vs NZ Final Live: When and Where to Watch India vs New Zealand T20 World Cup 2026 Title Clash -
Ind vs NZ T20 World Cup 2026: New Zealand Needs 256 Runs To Beat India And Win The World Cup -
UAE Attacks Iran, Becomes 5th Nation To Enter War; Reports Suggest Strike On Iranian Facility -
ICC T20 World Cup 2026 Final: Ricky Martin, Falguni Pathak To Perform At Closing Ceremony, How To Watch -
Who Is Nishant Kumar: Education, Personal Life and Possible Political Role -
IND vs NZ T20 WC Final: New Zealand Win Toss, Opt To Chase; Why Batting First Could Be A Tough Call For India -
Gold Rate Today 8 March 2026: IBJA Issues Fresh Gold Rates; Tanishq, Malabar, Kalyan, Joyalukkas Prices -
From Kerala Boy To World Cup Hero: Sanju Samson’s 89-Run Blitz, His Birth, Religion, Wife And Inspiring Story -
Hyderabad Gold Silver Rate Today, 8 March, 2026: Latest Gold Prices And Silver Rate In Nizam City -
Panauti Stadium? Is Narendra Modi Stadium an Unlucky Venue for India National Cricket Team? -
Storm Over West Bengal Govt's 'Snub' To President Droupadi Murmu












Click it and Unblock the Notifications