Bombay High Court upholds validity of Real Estate Act
A bench of Justices Naresh Patil and Rajesh Ketkar pronounced its judgement on a bunch of petitions filed by real estate developers and individual plot owners, all challenging the constitutional valid
Mumbai, December 6: The Bombay High Court Wednesday upheld the validity of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act (RERA).

A bench of Justices Naresh Patil and Rajesh Ketkar pronounced its judgement on a bunch of petitions filed by real estate developers and individual plot owners, all challenging the constitutional validity of the Act that was brought into effect earlier this year. The Act, among other things, mandates that all developers register themselves under a common regulatory authority.
It also allows buyers to claim compensation for delay in possession, and envisages cancellation of a developer's registration in case the developer fails to complete the project within stipulated deadline. The petitions claimed that the Act, and the constitution of a state-level authority for its implementation, were arbitrary, and therefore unconstitutional.
The bench, headed by Justice Patil, however, allowed a significant leeway for developers in today's judgement by permitting the state-level RERA authority and the Appellate Tribunal to consider delays on a case-to-case basis, and not to cancel projects or developers' registration in cases where the delay was caused due to "exceptional and compelling circumstances."
Most of the developers had challenged a provision of 'force majeure or a natural disaster', where any extension beyond a year for completion of project would have led to penalties.
The Centre and the state had vehemently defended the Act, and justified the strict provisions by arguing that the same were meant to protect buyers, and to rein in rogue developers.
In September, after several petitions challenging RERA were filed in high courts across the country, the Supreme Court stayed the proceedings in other courts and suggested that the Bombay High Court hear its RERA cases first.
Other courts should wait for the Bombay High Court's decision before hearing RERA-related matters, it said, while directing the high court here to expedite the hearings.
PTI
-
BCCI Breaks Silence On SRH Owner Kavya Maran’s Franchise Buying Pakistan’s Abrar Ahmed In The Hundred -
Gold Silver Rate Today, 13 March 2026: City-Wise Prices Down Across India; MCX Gold, Silver Ease -
Gold Rate Today 14 March 2026: IBJA Issues New Gold Prices; Tanishq, Malabar, Joyalukkas, Kalyan Rates -
New OTT Releases This Week: 37 New Films/Series In Hindi, Kannada, Tamil, Telugu & Malayalam In March 2nd Week -
Gold Silver Rate Today, 14 March 2026: City-Wise Prices Dip As MCX Gold, Silver Extend Losses -
Bangalore Gold Silver Rate Today, 13 March 2026: Gold Prices Down; Silver Steady After Market Volatility -
Did Ananya Panday Destroy Jio SIM To Protest Abrar Ahmed’s Signing by Kavya Maran’s Team? -
Karnataka Weather Alert: Pre-Monsoon Rains Likely in Bengaluru Next Week Before Summer Intensifies -
Tamil Nadu Election Dates: EC Set To Announce Polling & Counting Dates -
Tamil Nadu Petrol Stock: Is There A Shortage of Fuel In Chennai? IOCL Issues Clarification -
Gold Rate Today 13 March 2026: IBJA Morning Gold Rates Released; Tanishq, Malabar, Joyalukkas, Kalyan Prices -
Is Rakshit Shetty’s ‘Let’s Not Disrespect Any Human Being’ Video a Response to Rashmika Mandanna’s Mom?












Click it and Unblock the Notifications