Delhi lynching: Witnesses biased, exposing our ugly faces
There might not be concrete reports anywhere, but the racial undercurrent lingers. While the fellow Arunachalis are apprehensive of their lives in the country's capital, there are others who still cannot leave their ugly mindsets behind.
A live report by CNN-IBN , intended to give a detailed report of the altercation on the afternoon of the 29th, collected eye-witnesses in the area. What caught our eyes was the way the witnesses took sides with the shopkeeper, saying that the boy was doing fine after being dropped by the police and that he was not hurt at all after the first altercation. "All we heard was that he was dead", said a 'witness'.
Moreover, the attitude of the witnesses was completely unsympathetic toward the boy, especially when the 'described' how the boy 'flared' up for a comment by the shopkeeper targetting his hairstyle. The boy then allegedly broke the glass window of the shop, following which a major altercation began.
Now an interesting thing happened, when the lady journalist was panning way from the crowd, a man on her left shouted "drugs drugs...must have been that".
Here are a few points of contention:
1.
Where
did
the
injury
marks
and
the
swollen
neck
come
from
if
nothing
happened?
2.
If
the
altercation
was
as
small
as
that,
why
didn't
the
eyewitnesses
stop
it,
underlining
the
most
crucial
psyche
of
the
Delhiites:
we
will
watch
wrong
happenings
and
won't
raise
a
voice.
However, the most important of all the contentions is the fact that we generalise people of certain parts of the country or people belonging to different country. North Easterners are from 'China' and are always involved in 'drug trafficking'. They have a lot of money and are spoiling the mindset of the children.
Its not just about Delhi, its about Indian's mindset when they make preferances on misconstrued facts. Shame on you India!