Washington, Feb 23 (UNI) Patients who prefer to be highly involved in their treatment don't necessarily have better luck managing chronic health conditions, a new study suggests.
Researchers surveyed 189 veterans with high blood pressure to determine the patients' preferences for involvement in their health care. They discovered those who wanted an active role in their treatment had higher blood pressure and cholesterol over a 12-month span than those who wanted a less active role.
''The intuitive assumption is that the more involved people are with their health, the better they'll be at managing chronic conditions. We found evidence to the contrary,'' said Austin Baldwin, post-doctorate in the Center for Research in the Implementation of Innovative Strategies in Practice (CRIISP) at the VA Iowa City Health Care System and adjunct assistant professor of psychology in the UI College of Liberal Arts and Sciences.
''Those who preferred a more 'patient-centered' or active role actually had higher blood pressure and lipid levels. Those who preferred a 'provider-centered' approach, in which the doctor is more authoritative, did better at managing their blood pressure and lipid levels,'' Sciencedaily quoted him as saying.
The study conducted at the Veterans Affairs (VA) Iowa City Health Care System and the University of Iowa found that patients who preferred the most active role averaged a blood pressure of 141 over 79 and a low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol level of 112, while those who preferred the least active role averaged a blood pressure of 137 over 72 and an LDL of 92.
Doctors tell most patients with high blood pressure to aim for a blood pressure less than 140 over 90 and keep LDL cholesterol under 130, it added.
The average participant was 65.8 years old, and 97 per cent were men. Participants were recruited from the Iowa City and Minneapolis VA health care systems and four affiliated community-based outpatient clinics as part of a larger hypertension trial. The data was collected in 2004, the report said.
The research team offered a couple potential explanations for the results. One possibility is that patients who wanted an active role were dissatisfied with the relatively passive treatment of taking medication to control their conditions, and therefore may not have followed doctors' orders as well.
''They were presumably provided advice and guidance about modifying their lifestyle, but all of these patients were on hypertension medication, and many were on lipid-lowering medications,'' Dr Baldwin said. ''For those who want more control over their treatment, a relatively passive treatment like taking medication may not be a good match,'' he added.
One aspect of the study gave traction to this explanation. Some patients were diabetic. While those who preferred an active role did worse at managing blood pressure and cholesterol, they did slightly better at managing blood sugar (although the effect on managing blood sugar was not statistically significant).
Researchers believed that was because managing blood sugar was a more hands-on treatment involving blood sugar tests, diet regulation and sometimes medication.
Another potential explanation was that the patients' role preferences didn't match their doctors' role preferences. While this study did not assess providers' preferences, previous research suggested that a mismatch between patients' and providers' role preferences impact adherence to treatment recommendations.
Dr Baldwin said the research is important because if health professionals can assess patients' role preferences, they could potentially tailor treatment plans to give patients the best chance for a successful outcome. For example, patients with high blood pressure who want an active role could do better making more aggressive lifestyle changes and tracking their progress with a home blood pressure monitor, he added.
''The upshot of this research is that there isn't a one-size-fits-all approach. It's nice to think if we give everyone Treatment X, they're all going to do well,'' Dr Baldwin explained.
''But individual differences and preferences are important, and the value of studying this is to understand how these preferences can influence treatment adherence and ultimately influence people's health,'' he added.
UNI XC RJ KN2006