The Ram Temple jinx in SC; Why it is better to take the ordinance route now
New Delhi, Jan 28: Call it jinx or ample hints, the ordinance route appears to be the only way to go about the Ayodhya issue. It began with one of the judges recusing himself from hearing the case.
After this, a new Bench was constituted and hearing on the matter was scheduled for Tuesday. However due to the unavailability of Justice S A Bobde, hearing will not take place tomorrow.
Ayodhya dispute: No show on Tuesday, SC judge unavailable
The
Ayodhya
dispute
has
been
on
for
nearly
6
decades
now.
Despite
an
order
of
the
Allahabad
High
Court,
the
matter
has
not
been
resolved.
The
HC
had
ordered
that
the
land
be
split
four
ways
in
a
bid
to
resolve
the
issue.
However
none
of
the
parties
were
happy
with
the
order,
following
which
an
appeal
was
preferred
in
the
Supreme
Court.
In
the
SC,
the
matter
has
been
pending
for
nearly
8
years
now.
When
the
matter
had
come
up
last
year,
a
question
of
law
was
posed
before
the
Bench.
The
question
was
whether
a
Mosque
is
essential
to
Islam.
While hearing appeals against the order of the Allahabad High Court on the Ram Janmabhumi issue, the Muslim appellants had requested the court to revisit a 1994 SC verdict which had held that a Mosque is not an essential part of Islam. The 1994 verdict in the Ismail Faruqui case had also said that namaz could be offered anywhere by Muslims.
The appellants said that this question of law must be answered before the SC goes into the main title suit. The court could either hold the contention in the 1994 correct or decide to revisit it. The SC however upheld the Faruqi verdict and paved the way to hear the original appeals.
Another plea was filed before the court of the Chief Justice of India seeking an early hearing into the matter. However CJI, Ranjan Gogoi refused to take up the matter out of turn. In January a new Bench was constituted to hear the matter.
When the matter came up for hearing, one of the advocates pointed out that one of the judges on the Bench, Justice U U Lalit had appeared for Kalyan Singh in a connected matter. Justice Lalit then recused himself from hearing the matter, following which another Bench was constituted.
Judges who will hear the Ayodhya dispute in Supreme Court
A new comprising Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi and Justices S A Bobde, D Y Chandrachud, Ashok Bhushan and S A Nazeer was constituted. The court had directed the registry to keep all documents ready by January 28 so that it could hear the matter.
However on Sunday, the registry issued a circular stating that the matter would not be heard on Tuesday due to the unavailability of Justice S A Bobde.
Now a fresh date would have to be fixed, following which the hearing would resume. The BJP would want a resolution to the issue before the polls are held. The party is under pressure to take the ordinance route instead of waiting for an order from the Supreme Court.
Sources say that an ordinance route is likely and some announcement would be made soon. The government has been contemplating a major announcement ahead of the elections. It could either bring out an ordinance on the Ram Temple and make it a major poll issue.