Click it and Unblock the Notifications
Just In
Don't Miss
-
Entertainment LIVE Blog: Arti Singh To Tie The Knot Today; Salman Khan Poses With SLB At Heeramandi Premiere -
Rs. 7.75/Share Dividend: Record Date In Due Course; Buy The TATA Group Stock? -
IPL 2024 Centuries List: Full List of Hundreds of All IPL Seasons - All You Need to Know -
When Will Vaishakh Month 2024 Start? Vrats And Festivals That Will Fall This Month, Complete List! -
JEE Main Result 2024 Out, Telangana's 15 Toppers Shine, Check Statewise List of 56 Candidates with Perfect 100 -
Escape to Kalimpong, Gangtok, and Darjeeling with IRCTC's Tour Package; Check Itinerary -
OPPO Find X7 Ultra Camera Deep-Dive: Pushing the Boundaries of Photography on a Smartphone -
Aston Martin Vantage Launched In India At Rs 3.99 Crore
'Swamy invokes fundamental right to pray at Ayodhya, not now', says SC
BJP leader Subramanian Swamy moved the Supreme Court seeking urgent hearing of his plea for enforcement of his fundamental right to worship at the birthplace of Lord Ram.
A Bench comprising Chief Justice (CJI) Dipak Misra and Justices A Khanwilkar and D Y Chandrachud considered the submission of Swamy that his fundamental right to worship at the site was at the higher pedestal in contrast to the property rights of the rival parties to the civil litigation.
"No, no. Not now," the CJI said. The Centre was represented by senior advocate Aman Sinha.
Earlier, a Special Bench of the CJI and Justices Ashok Bhushan and S A Nazeer, on March 14, had dashed the hopes of activists like Shyam Benegal and Teesta Setalvad to intervene in the Ayodhya land dispute case and made it clear that only the parties to original lawsuits would be allowed contest.
It had also disallowed Swamy, at whose instance the cases were fhttps://www.oneindia.com/india/swamy-invokes-fundamental-right-to-pray-at-ayodhya-not-now-says-sc-2683587.htmlast-tracked, to intervene in the main case.
However, the bench had considered Swamy's submission that he had not sought to intervene in the matter but filed a separate writ petition seeking enforcement of his fundamental right to worship at the birthplace of Lord Ram in Ayodhya.
"I had filed a writ petition saying that I have a fundamental right to worship and this is a superior right than the property right," Swamy had said.
"As we are not inclined to permit the intervention application, the writ petition filed by the applicant (Swamy) shall stand revived and it shall be dealt with by the appropriate bench in accordance with law," the bench had said.
On Monday, Swamy sought urgent listing of his plea for the enforcement of fundamental right to worship.
A three-judge bench of the Allahabad High Court, in a 2:1 majority ruling, had in 2010 ordered that the land is partitioned equally among three parties -- the Sunni Waqf Board, the Nirmohi Akhara and Ram Lalla.
