• search
For Quick Alerts
ALLOW NOTIFICATIONS  
For Daily Alerts

Section 144 not a tool to oppress difference of opinion: SC verdict on J&K in 15 points

|

New Delhi, Jan 10: In an important order the Supreme Court held that the Internet is a fundamental right and the services are intrinsic to right to free speech.

The observation was made while delivering the verdict on a batch of petitions on the situation in Jammu and Kashmir following the abrogation of Article 370.

Section 144 not a tool to oppress difference of opinion: SC verdict on J&K in 15 points

Here are the key top observations by the court:

  • Jammu and Kashmir administration to review all restrictive orders within a week.
  • All orders are to be put in public domain which can then be challenged in a court of law.
  • All orders of restriction under Section 144 of the Code of Criminal Procedure should be published so as to enable affected persons to challenge it.
  • Temporary suspension of internet, basic freedom of citizens should not be arbitrary. It should be open to judicial review.
  • The internet suspension should be reviewed.
  • Freedom of internet is a fundamental right under Article 19(1), which deals with free speech.
  • Trade and commerce through internet is protected under Article 19(1) (g), which deals with fundamental right to conduct trade and commerce.
  • Internet services are intrinsic to right to free speech and cannot be suspended without providing reason and duration thereof.
  • Certain trade and commerce are completely dependant on the Internet. Such trade and freedom to practise then is constitutionality protected as fundamental right under Article 19(1)(g).

Review internet suspension in J&K forthwith rules Supreme Court

    SC on J&K: All restrictive orders must be made public, review all restrictions within a week
    • Mere expression of dissent or disagreement against a government decision cannot be a reason for Internet suspension
    • Section 144, cannot be used as a tool to oppress difference of opinion.
    • Magistrates while passing restrictive orders under Section 144 should apply their minds and have a sense of proportionality between danger to security and liberty of citizens.
    • Repetitive orders without giving reasons and not based on material facts will be violative.
    • Suspension of free movement, the Internet and basic freedom cannot be an arbitrary exercise of power.
    • Expressions through the internet and social media have contemporary relevance.

    For Daily Alerts
    Get Instant News Updates
    Enable
    x
    Notification Settings X
    Time Settings
    Done
    Clear Notification X
    Do you want to clear all the notifications from your inbox?
    Settings X
    We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. This includes cookies from third party social media websites and ad networks. Such third party cookies may track your use on Oneindia sites for better rendering. Our partners use cookies to ensure we show you advertising that is relevant to you. If you continue without changing your settings, we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies on Oneindia website. However, you can change your cookie settings at any time. Learn more
    X