• search
For Quick Alerts
ALLOW NOTIFICATIONS  
For Daily Alerts

SC fixes pleas of Kashmir Times Editor, Others for hearing on Sept 16

|

Srinagar, Sep 05: The Supreme Court on Thursday fixed for hearing on September 16 pleas of the Kashmir Times Editor and others on alleged communication blockade in Jammu and Kashmir.

Anuradha Bhasin, the Executive Editor of Kashmir Times, told a bench headed by Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi that even after a month of the scrapping of Article 370, journalists were "not allowed to move freely in the state".

Representational image

However, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta told the court that editors of Kashmir Times chose not to publish their newspaper from Srinagar.

30 days of lockdown, Valley limps back to normalcy gradually

The Centre told the bench that a large number of newspapers were being published from Srinagar.

Attorney General KK Venugopal told the court that step by step relaxation was being allowed in Jammu and Kashmir.

The Solicitor General also told the bench that all other newspapers are being published from all the three places - Jammu, Kashmir, and Ladakh.

He said, "My concern is why she (Bhasin) chose not to publish her newspaper from Srinagar".

At the outset, advocate Vrinda Grover, appearing for the journalist, submitted that the Editor-in-chief of Kashmir Times traveled to many parts of the state and according to him, the situation was such that media cannot work due to "communication restrictions".

She said it was not clear as to on what basis there is a "communication blockade" which has resulted in the information blackout.

The advocate claimed that during the Editor-in-chief's interaction with the people, one of the doctors spoke about the humanitarian medico-crisis.

Delhi HC seeks response from Centre regarding Shah Faesal's plea

The editor also alleged that it is difficult to travel beyond Srinagar and journalists are finding it difficult to report.

While she was making the submissions, some of the lawyers said they have filed a caveat in the matter and submitted that the petition of Bhasin was not maintainable.

However, the bench concluded the hearing on the matter by asking the parties to complete formalities of filing counter-affidavit and replies and posted the matter for final disposal on September 16.

However, the court said it was not going to entertain the writ petition filed by Congress activist and businessman Tehseen Poonawalla seeking the removal of restrictions in Kashmir Valley and made it clear that he can only make his stand clear as an intervener in the petition filed by Bhasin.

The court said whatever grievances he has raised in the petition can be advanced during the hearing on September 16 by him as an intervener.

For Daily Alerts
Get Instant News Updates
Enable
x
Notification Settings X
Time Settings
Done
Clear Notification X
Do you want to clear all the notifications from your inbox?
Settings X
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. This includes cookies from third party social media websites and ad networks. Such third party cookies may track your use on Oneindia sites for better rendering. Our partners use cookies to ensure we show you advertising that is relevant to you. If you continue without changing your settings, we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies on Oneindia website. However, you can change your cookie settings at any time. Learn more