Lone woman judge on SC Bench upholds ban on women entry into Sabarimala
New Delhi, Sep 28: In a 4:1 verdict the Supreme Court lifted a century old ban on the women in the age group of 10 and 50 into the Sabarimala Temple. While Chief Justice Dipak Misra, Justices A M Khanwilkar, R Nariman and D Chandrachud gave a concurrent finding, the lone woman judge on the Bench Justice Indu Malhotra had a dissenting view.
In her verdict she said that issues raised have serious implications for all religions. She said that issues which have deep religious connotation should be tinkered with to maintain a secular atmosphere in the country.
Also
SC throws open doors of Sabarimala Temple to women
Justice Indu Malhotra further said that the right to equality claimed by some conflicts with the right to follow a religious practise, is again a fundamental right. In her judgment she rejected the entry of women of all ages into the Sabarimala Temple.
Justice Malhotra said that India has diverse religious practises and constitutional morality would allow anyone to profess and practise a religion she or he believes in and it is not for the court to interfere in such religious practises, even it may appear discriminatory.
SC allows women of all ages to enter Kerala temple: A timeline of events
The
present
judgment
will
not
be
limited
to
Sabarimala
alone
and
it
will
have
wide
ramifications.
Issues
of
deep
religious
sentiments
should
not
interfered
into
she
said.
She
further
said
that
what
is
essential
practise
in
a
religion
is
for
the
religion
to
decide.
It
is
a
matter
of
personal
faith
and
India
is
a
land
of
diverse
faiths.
Constitutional morality in a pluralistic society gives freedom to practise even irrational customs.
She also added that judges cannot intervene and decide on whether a practice is violative of fundamental rights or not. Personal views of judges do not matter. A religious denomination has freedom to believe and even practice even if their beliefs are illogical or irrational, Justice Malhotra also added.
{document1}