Click it and Unblock the Notifications
Just In
Don't Miss
-
UPSC Success Story: A Bombay IITian, A Government Job Holder at Railways, Quit the Job and Emerged as an IAS -
Kapil Sharma Reaches Vaishno Devi; Offers Prayers To The Shrine By Singing ‘Tune Mujhe Bulaya’, Watch -
Chaitra Navratri 2024: Your Sky Blue Ethnic Outfits Guide For Day 9 Look -
10 Bonus Shares, 1:2 & 1:5 Splits; Smallcap Steel Stock Below Rs 15, Falls 10% In 5 Days; Plans FPO Ahead -
Olympic Flame Lit For Paris Games Amidst Ancient Olympia's Charm In Greece -
Jeep Compass Gets More Powerful 268.3bhp Turbo Petrol Engine – Check Out All The Details Here -
Redmi Pad SE With 90Hz Display Launching on April 23 in India; Could Be Priced for Less Than Rs 20,000 -
From Coconut Breaking on Head to Men Dressing as Women: 12 Unique Indian Rituals Explored
2002 Gujarat riots: SC to hear Zakia Jafri’s plea challenging Modi’s acquittal on Nov 19
New Delhi, Nov 13: The Supreme Court on Tuesday said that it would hear Zakia Jafri's petition challenging the clean chit given to Narendra Modi who was chief minister of Gujarat during the 2002 riots. Zakia is the wife of slain former Congress MP Ehsan Jafri. The top court will take up the case on November 19.
A Special Investigation Team, which investigated the riots, gave a clean chit to then Gujarat CM Narendra Modi.
Jafri and Citizen for Justice and Peace, an NGO run by activist Teesta Setalvad, had filed the criminal review petition against a magistrates courts order which upheld the closure report of the Special Investigation Team (SIT).
The petition demanded to make Modi and 59 others accused for being party to "the larger criminal conspiracy" behind the post-Godhra riots of 2002.
Ehsan Jafri, a former MP, was one of the riot victims. He and 67 others were killed when a mob set his house in Gulberg Society here on fire on February 28, 2002, a day after the Godhra train burning incident.
The SIT, which probed Jafri's complaint alleging a deeper conspiracy, submitted before the high court that its investigation was monitored by the apex court, and its report was largely accepted by all.
The lower court looked into all aspects and held that there was no need to investigate the matter further from the angle of larger conspiracy involving the state functionaries, it said.
Zakia Jafri's lawyer Mihir Desai, on the other hand, argued that the magistrates court did not even consider the option of rejecting the report and ordering a fresh probe.
The lower court ignored Supreme Courts guidelines and did not consider signed statements of witnesses which suggested that there was a conspiracy behind riots, he said.
The magistrate ignored submissions of key witnesses such as (former IPS officers) Sanjiv Bhatt, R B Shreekumar, and Rahul Sharma, and ignored findings of Tehelka magazine, advocate Desai argued.
The SIT filed its closure report giving a clean chit to Modi and others on February 8, 2012 before the metropolitan magistrates court here.
