Court to consider defamation complaint against Modi, others on Nov 26
Sreekumar, who retired as the Director General of Gujarat Police, had on November 19 also named BJP's spokesperson Meenakshi Lekhi and Nambi Narayanan, a retired scientist of Vikram Sarabhai Space Centre (VSSC), as accused in his complaint.
During the hearing on Thursday, Metropolitan Magistrate Akash Jain posted it for November 26 after advocate Vijay Aggarwal, who appeared for Narayanan, said Sreekumar's petition is misguiding the court and it is based on 'falsity'.
"The court is being misguided. They (Sreekumar) are quoting false provisions of law. Offence of perjury has been committed," Aggarwal claimed in the court.
He also said he has come to know about the defamation case through the media reports as Sreekumar had openly told the scribes about it.
"They
(Sreekumar)
are
stating
incorrect
laws
to
the
court
and
that
is
why
it
is
perjury,"
he
said.
The
court,
however,
told
him
that
it
would
go
through
the
facts
mentioned
in
the
complaint.
"Let me first go through what are the facts in the complaint," the magistrate said.
Advocate Brijesh Kalappa, who appeared for Sreekumar, told the court that his client is the complainant and the court should first hear him.
To
this,
Aggarwal
said
the
court
cannot
proceed
with
the
matter
or
pass
any
order
without
hearing
him.
The
magistrate
said
"I
am
not
saying
that
I
will
not
hear
you
(Aggarwal)."
PTI