Her Facebook post has gone viral. On Saturday, Aug 1, she posted her ordeal on Facebook, that has gone viral and has got 6.8k likes and 1.8k shares.
This is her Facebook post:
"Hi everyone. I am posting this message to share my experience with judiciary on a sexual harassment case filed by me.
Santosh Chaubey, Aayogmitra of MP Human Rights Commission was sending me indecent messages last week. I had filed an FIR against him and criminal action is being pursued against him. He was immediately removed from his job, thanks to the swift action by my Collector, Shri Bharat Yadav.
Today, I went to give my statement to the Judicial Magistrate. While I was giving my statement, an advocate named Lalit Sharma was standing next, overhearing my statement, along with others in the court."
I asked the judicial magistrate to ask others to leave as I was uncomfortable giving my statement in front of so many people.
On saying this, Lalit Sharma started shouting at me, saying "how dare you suggest me to leave, I am an advocate here and you might be an officer in your office but not in the Court.
I told him that the privacy I am demanding is not as an IAS officer but as a woman and laws provide me with that. He started arguing and eventually left.
Such is the state of affairs for women in this country. When I said to Judicial Magistrate that he should be careful of presence of other people when a woman is giving statement under sexual harassment case, he said that you are young and that's why demanding such things.
Idiots are lined up at every step and people are highly insensitive towards our sufferings. If you are born in this country, better prepare yourself for struggle at every step."
Later, she wrote another post in which she said "the entire experience made me realize how insensitive the criminal justice system is towards the sensitive matters of sexual crimes. I have full faith in the institutions of this country."
She narrated the entire incident again in a fresh post saying, "I had appeared before the Court to record my statement under sec 164 (5) CrPC for FIR number 0687 dated 26/7/2015. This FIR was registered by me against a person named Mr Santosh Chaubey, Ayogya Mitra of MP Human Rights Commission in Seoni district. Santosh Chaubey was harassing me by sending indecent messages. I reported that to my senior, Shri Bharat Yadav, Collector & DM, Seoni. He immediately wrote about this harassment to MPHRC and Santosh Chaubey was vacated from official responsibilities with immediate effect.
As a young woman facing the Court for the first time in a sensitive matter of sexual harassment, I realized why women do not want to come out in the open and report sexual harassment cases.
The entire experience was horrible and traumatic.
On reaching the Court, I requested the Hon'ble Judicial Magistrate to kindly allow me in camera recording of statement. Even before the Court had decided on my request, an advocate, who happened to be standing there, started screaming at me as to how dare I make such a request. He started using very rude language and said that I might be an IAS officer in my office but this was his Court and he was not leaving.
I requested him to allow me some privacy, which I sought not as an IAS officer, but as a woman reliving the horrible experience of sexual harassment. But probably this advocate was more interested in demeaning me than facilitating justice against perpetrator of sexual harassment.
He was not even a party to the case but just a bystander and he still did not allow me my privacy and kept arguing and using rude language. Finally after much argument, he left.
During this entire incident, the Hon'ble Judicial Magistrate maintained complete silence. He never decided on whether I could be allowed in camera proceeding. He was a spectator to the abuse I had to face for asserting my dignity and privacy. Worse, when I finally recorded my statement, he remarked that I was a young, new recruit on first posting, which was why I had these expectations of privacy and that I would get to know the system and Courts with time and get done away with such demands.
If this is the state of apathy and insensitivity that a woman with supposedly privileged position of an IAS faces in our Courts, one cannot even imagine the plight of ordinary women seeking justice.
It is no surprise that crimes against women are increasing and that so many women remain silent in cases of sexual harassment.
My offender has had a history of such abuses which were never reported earlier. I empathize with those women who remained silent, as the criminal justice system expects us to relive the experience in the glare of open Court and the so-called ‘officers of the Court' are more keen to teach me my place as a woman than to help me assert my rights and get justice.
Women have very high expectations from the judiciary as it was the Hon'ble Supreme Court that filled the legislative vacuum for sexual harassment at work place through the landmark Vishaka Judgment.
A woman comes to the Court with hopes of justice. She expects an unbiased trial and compassionate treatment. But what I underwent gave me a feeling of re-victimisation. I do not wish to prejudice the decision of the case but I already feel a sense of injustice owing to the lack of sensitive procedure while dealing with this case. I felt belittled and humiliated by being subjected to this kind of ego play.
I am sure your good self would exercise the powers vested in you to take appropriate action. I have not lost faith in the institutions of this great country, which have historically intervened to uphold the dignity and honour of women. I humbly beseech your office to take note of this incident and the role of Hon'ble Judicial Magistrate and Advocate and take any necessary action that you may deem fit. I humbly request your good office to sensitize the judges and advocates on the important role they have to play if women have to come forward and seek justice against sexual crimes."
On Tuesday, Aug 4, Riju Bafna thankful the media for the coverage. She further wrote:
"To reiterate once again, the issue is not just about me but the general lack of women friendly procedure in such cases. The legislature has provided mandatory in camera proceedings for rape cases; however, there is a need to extend the same to other sexual offences too.
As civil servants, we must focus on how the institutions of the State should become more humane and sympathetic to the common people they serve and to strive for changes in the system that will facilitate better, honorable and dignified interaction with the State for every citizen.
And it is in this regard that I intend my post to be seen- not merely a redressal for wrongs that might have been done but to bring up for public reasoning, an important aspect of our judicial and administrative system.
I would like to re-emphasise that my Collector, Shri Bharat Yadav has been very swift in his action and has taken up the matter with the concerned authorities with great celerity.
The District Judge Seoni is taking actions to ensure that such incidents are not repeated for those who come to seek justice in good faith.
There is a lot of support from the highest levels of Madhya Pradesh government and the expressions of support and guidance I have recieved has re-ignited my confidence in the ability of the system to listen to voices and correct itself .
I hope this incidence serves as a trigger to further the women friendly court procedures across the country."