New Delhi, April 11:Greenpeace India on Saturday issued a point by point rebuttal of charges made against it by the government and said it would not only challenge the order in courts but also continue to campaign fearlessly.
The government on Thursday announced it has "temporarily" suspended the registration of Greenpeace India under the foreign contributions law for "under-reporting" such funding and conducting transactions in such funds without informing the authorities as required by the law.
On Saturday Greenpeace said that "This (freezing of accounts) means that GP India's permission to receive money from overseas is currently suspended. It does not mean that GP India itself has been shut down or will have to shut down. GP India gets nearly 70 percent of its income from domestic donations and will continue to operate on those funds even as it fights the Foreign Contribution Regulation Act (FCRA) suspension."
The environmental watchdog believes this is an escalation of the intimidation campaign that started with a "leaked" Intelligence Bureau report in June last year.
"It is the government using strong arm tactics to clamp down on dissenting voices in civil society. We have been vindicated in our position more than once in the courts. In fact, the Delhi High Court held that the actions of the home ministry in the Priya Pillai case were arbitrary and the charges against Greenpeace India were misconceived," a statement from Greenpeace said.
"We will not only challenge the Ministry of Home Affairs in courts, but also continue to campaign fearlessly on the issues we work on," it said.
Also read: Greenpeace: Brewing trouble for Indian tea
Greenpeace claimed that some of its domestic accounts have been frozen as well. It also denied the allegation that it had sponsored a Channel 4 (Britain) journalist's visit to the Mahan forests in Madhya Pradesh.
"This is one of the many lies in the home ministry report. In a response to Greenpeace, Hugo Ward, director of the programme from Channel 4, denied the allegation," the statement said.
On high salaries being paid to certain senior employees, it said that "We believe that good talent should also be able to work on issues of environment and social justice, and we like to make this possible."
"However, we ensure that there is parity between the amount paid to the executive director and the lowest paid employee in the organisation."