Jayalalithaa DA case: Last leg of arguments in Supreme Court
New Delhi, April 19: The arguments in the J Jayalalithaa disproportionate case continued before the Supreme Court today.The arguments today were advanced by the counsel for Sasikala Natrajan, Ilavarasi and Sudhakaran who were also acquitted in the same case by the Karnataka High Court.
Jayalalithaa DA case- Prosecution has failed to prove disproportionate assets
Arguments began with the counsel for Sasikala Natrajan stating that it was wrong to say that she was a proxy. Her advocate also argued that Sasikala Natrajan did not behave like a extra constitutional authority. The allegation that her proximity to Jayalalithaa was used by her is wrong.
The entire prosecution is flawed. The prosecution had completely failed to prove before the High Court charges of abetment and possession of disproportionate assets.
There
has
been
a
clear
finding
given
by
the
High
Court
and
I
wonder
why
this
needs
to
be
looked
into
again,
Sasikala
Natrajan's
counsel
also
told
the
Bench.
The
investigators
have
been
proven
completely
wrong
and
that
is
why
we
were
acquitted
says
Sasikala
Natrajan's
counsel
in
Supreme
Court.
The
allegations
that
I
was
running
a
proxy
government
is
not
right.
Karnataka
to
file
counter:
During
the
course
of
the
arguments
the
counsel
indicated
that
he
would
conclude
arguments
by
Thursday.
Since
the
facts
of
the
case
and
the
appeal
contents
are
identical,
it
would
not
be
necessary
to
advance
extensive
arguments.
Moreover counsel for Jayalalithaa, L Nageshwar had made detailed submissions before the Supreme Court two weeks back in which the entire contentions in the appeal were covered.
Since Karnataka is the prosecuting agency and the appellant state, it would be given another chance to argue. Karnataka is likely to make a quick submission apart from handing over its written counter statements to the Bench comprising Justices P C Ghose and Amitava Roy.
Following this the Bench will take up a petition that had been filed by an advocate questioning the jurisdiction of the court in hearing an appeal by Karnataka. However advocates part of this case say that it may be a short hearing.
If the Supreme Court had to decide on jurisdiction it would have taken up the matter immediately and not after the conclusion of the arguments. Once this petition is heard the Bench will reserve its orders.
OneIndia News