Click it and Unblock the Notifications
Just In
Don't Miss
-
Kerala SSLC Results 2024: Number of Ways you can check the Results -
Former Zimbabwe Cricketer, who slept with crocodile under his bed in 2013, survives leopard attack this time -
President Joe Biden Signs Bill to Ban TikTok in the US: Unless This One Condition is Met -
Heeramandi: Richa Chadha Over The Moon As Rekha Cried And Hugged Her -
BMW i5 M60 xDrive Launched In India At Rs 1.195 Crore - 592bhp, 516km Range -
Gold Prices Ayodhya: In Ram-Janma-Bhumi, 24carat Falls By Rs 380 In 10-Grams, Drops By Rs 3,800 In 100-gram -
Heeramandi Screening: Alia Bhatt, Ananya Panday, Rashmika Mandanna And Others Serve Finest Ethnic Style! -
Escape to Kalimpong, Gangtok, and Darjeeling with IRCTC's Tour Package; Check Itinerary
Flashback 2015- India's year of free speech online
New Delhi, Dec 17: The year 2015 witnessed a landmark judgment from the Supreme Court in which a controversial law which was considered to be an infringement on free speech was scrapped.
The contentious Section 66 (A) of the Information Technology Act was declared ultra vires and unconstitutional by the Supreme Court of India.
The bone of contention relating to Section 66 (A) was that the police had too much power to arrest persons for merely criticising someone online.
It was argued at length that Section 66 (A) was misused most by politicians who would unleash the law on those who would criticise them.
The
right
to
free
speech:
Section
66
(A)
of
the
IT
act
was
challenged
by
a
law
student
Shreya
Singhal
after
two
young
women
were
arrested
in
2012
for
posting
comments
that
were
critical
of
Mumbai
being
shut
down
for
the
funeral
of
Bal
Thackeray.
In
her
petition
she
contended
that
none
should
fear
putting
up
something
for
the
fear
of
going
to
jail.
It was further argued that the law was vague in nature and there are no guidelines. It alleged that the police could interpret the law the way they liked which had led to misuse. In fact it was the previous Congress led government that implemented this law stating that there was a dire need to combat defamatory content posted online.
The Supreme Court agreed with the contentions that were raised by the petitioners and said that the public has a right to know. With Section 66 (A) in place, the public's right to know is affected. The court struck down the section stating that it infringed upon right to speech as enshrined in the Constitution of India.
The Union Government assured the court that it would come up with a new law. It was also stated that a new law with necessary amendments would come up and the same would be done after consultations. The government is however yet to come up with a new law to this effect.
The Information and Technology Ministry under whose purview this matter would fall says that the consultation process is still on.
One India News
