Action in Myanmar, reaction in Pak: How BJP beat Congress in foreign policy challenge
The Indian Army's campaign against the militants in Myanmar after 18 soldiers were killed in an ambush on June 4 has given the BJP a major boost not only on the foreign policy front but also in domestic politics. For the action has put opposition Congress on the backfoot as it is now struggling to find a way to take on the Narendra Modi government.
Congress's dilemma after army action against militancy
The Congress has congratulated the army for the operation but did not give any credit to the Modi government. It has also maintained silence on the Modi government's role in tackling the terror threat for it knows opening its mouth at this juncture could prove to be counter-productive.
Congress's Kargil moment is here again
The Congress leadership had faced a similar dilemma during the Kargil War in 1999 when the Atal Bihari Vajpayee government was in power at the Centre.
Even though the government couldn't stop the intrusion in Kargil and many Indian soldiers had lost their lives but still the Vajpayee government had the last laugh by driving out the Pakistani intruders. The NDA, which was serving as a caretaker government then, rode the wave of nationalism to return to power in the general election that followed the Kargil War victory.
The Congress had no clue but back the government of the day.
Assertive nationalism has made a difference between Congress and BJP
The Congress and the BJP do not have much of a difference in many areas but assertive nationalism is one factor that makes a big difference between the two.
Congress had two major foreign policy debacles
The Congress had seen serious adversity in its foreign policy exercise when India was annihilated by the Chinese in 1962.
Rajiv
Gandhi
government's
blunder
in
sending
a
peace-keeping
force
to
Sri
Lanka
in
the
late
1980s
was
another
major
loss
of
face
for
the
Congress
in
foreign
policy.
These
incidents
continue
to
tarnish
the
Congress's
image
among
India's
forces
of
assertive
nationalism,
despite
the
fact
that
the
same
party
had
seen
India
defeating
arch-rivals
Pakistan
in
three
wars
in
1947,
1965
and
1971.
Congress's
foreign
policy
success
had
its
limitations
The facts that the Kashmir issue has remained unsettled despite India winning the 1947 war and that Bangladesh did not remain a loyal ally to India after its birth in 1971 following the third India-Pakistan war have marred the Congress's legacy.
How NDA has played the nationalism card more wisely
But
the
NDA
has
played
the
dice
of
nationalism
more
wisely.
It
hasn't
really
taken
a
route
of
confrontation
vis-a-vis
a
powerful
foe
like
China
despite
describing
it
as
India's
main
enemy
(as
George
Fernandes
had
done
in
the
past)
and
focussed
on
a
competition
with
the
latter
and
used
the
army
action
in
Myanmar
to
flex
its
muscle
vis-a-vis
Pakistan
even
though
there
is
very
less
possibility
that
it
will
repeat
the
same
there.
UPA
govt's
handling
of
26/11
and
Kerala
fishermen's
killing
had
disappointed
many
The
BJP
has
reaped
more
benefits
in
terms
of
assertive
nationalism
because
it
has
used
the
media
in
a
better
way
to
highlight
its
action.
Just
compare
the
disappointing
performance
of
some
top
Congress
leaders
after
the
26/11
terror
attacks
in
Mumbai
or
how
the
people
of
India
were
dissatisfied
with
the
UPA
government's
handling
of
the
Kerala
fishermen's
issue.
Modi
scored
over
Manmohan
on
Bangladesh
Even the Modi government's success in making the land agreement deal with Bangladesh made it look better in comparison with the previous Manmohan Singh government which was unable to even convince a mercurial Mamata Banerjee to sit on the negotiation table with Dhaka.
The Congress had faced a similar dilemma after the Kargil War in 1999
The Congress now has little option in confronting Modi over foreign policy issues. After the army operation in Myanmar, the Gandhis can't really accuse the ruling alliance of going soft on China and Pakistan over border violations.