Guru, Rajoana, Rajiv killers: Same story, different ending
If the Centre can call the shots on Kashmir, then why not on Punjab or Tamil Nadu? The question has been rightly raised by many, including Jammu and Kashmir Chief Minister Omar Abdullah. The J&K CM was worried that the execution of Guru would alienate the new-generation youths and rued that the man was not allowed to meet his family before he was hanged.
The National Conference (NC) leader has right reasons to worry. He made a pertinent point by asking the Centre to hang those convicted in the assassination of former Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi. He also referred to the killing of former Punjab Chief Minister Beant Singh. Those cases took place much before the 2001 Parliament attack. Then why no hang them as well?
Abdullah did not spare the opposition BJP, either. He said the opposition had been shouting over Guru's hanging but why is it not equally vocal about executing Santhan, Murugan, Perarivalan or Balwant Singh Rajoana? All of them were given death sentence but the execution could not be carried out owing to political compulsions.
Will judicial decisions continue to be shaped by political expediency?
The BJP countered by saying that it was always in favour of strongly dealing with terrorism and accused the Congress of failing to take a strong decision because of electoral compulsion. It also said that it had maintained a distance with party leader Ram Jethmalani when he defended the convicted in Rajiv assassination case. But why is the party quiet on hanging Rajoana or Devinder Singh Bhullar? Just because it is an ally of the Shiromani Akali Dal (SAD), which is against the hangings, in government?
The
Punjab
government
said
executing
Rajoana
could
lead
to
disruption
in
law
and
order
in
the
state
and
hence
the
order
was
stayed
last
year.
Now,
the
Congress
in
the
state
is
raising
the
demand
for
the
execution
and
pressurising
the
SAD-BJP
ruling
alliance
to
make
its
stand
on
the
issue
clear.
My
be
because
it
is
feeling
much
relieved
after
carrying
out
two
quick
executions
and
is
preparing
to
turn
the
barrel
of
the
gun
around.
Regional
politics
shaping
issues
of
national
importance
Some political observers have opined that Abdullah criticised Guru's execution for he wanted to find an ally in his constituency by sharing the common people's view. But Abdullah can not be blamed for this. Regional-political considerations have always had influenced crucial decisions like executing a convict in this country. The politics of opportunism practised by both the national parties has found a mirror reflection in the regional politics as well.
In August 2011, the Tamil Nadu Assembly passed a resolution demanding that the three killers of Rajiv Gandhi should not be hanged. Their execution was supposed to take place on September 9 but the Madras High Court stayed the order. The then Union Law Minister Salman Khurshid said the resolution was not binding but yet the execution could not be forced. Both the AIADMK and DMK, which otherwise lock horns over every other issue, backed the demand for not hanging Rajiv's killers at various points of time. Other regional parties in Tamil Nadu have also toed the same line.
States start seeking amnesty for convicts through resolutions: Is TN's move justified?
The Tamil Nadu resolution set a bad precedent and Abdullah had tweeted just a few hours afterwards asking what would be the reaction if his government also passed a similar resolution on Afzal Guru? Engineer Rashid, an Independent MLA in J&K assembly, had indeed taken a cue from the Tamil Nadu assembly to move a resolution demanding amnesty for Guru in September 2011 but in February 2012, Rashid was marshalled out of the assembly on charges of creating ruckus and disrupting the House over his resolution.
The problem is that regional sentiments, which are increasingly influencing the course of national politics, identify the convicted criminals more than their offence and political forces can not afford to annoy these sentiments by making an objective stand to ensure a safe future. The situation consequently becomes difficult for the national parties irrespective of their broader perspective for they are becoming more and more dependent on regional forces today.
Narendra Modi has a good relation with J Jayalalithaa and would not want to put a probable alliance at peril and create hindrance on his way to becoming the prime minister, if the situation so permits. The Congress, on the other hand, would not have a big say either for its ally, the DMK, is equally not eager to enrage Tamil sentiments. The Gandhis have also shown an intent to pardon the offenders, another factor that might have discouraged the Congress to take up the issue strongly.
Politics
serve
complication,
not
sensitivity
The
situation
in
Punjab
is
similar.
There,
separatist
voices
are
seen
to
be
on
a
revival
course
in
the
recent
years
and
no
party,
not
even
the
Congress,
would
opt
for
a
collision
course
with
the
local
sentiments.
The
fact
that
both
Tamil
Nadu
and
Punjab
send
more
number
of
representatives
to
the
Parliament
than
Jammu
and
Kashmir
also
make
the
regional
politics
in
those
states
more
complicated.
Politics,
after
all,
devotes
itself
more
to
complication
than
sensitivity.
Hence,
Guru
lost
out.