Karnataka polls: Probe into Cong sale of tickets
The party has formed a committee with AK Antony and Ambika Soni as members to prepare a report on the controversy even as it struggles to release the second list for the Karnataka Assembly elections slated for May 5.
Till
now
the
Congress
has
announced
candidates
for
177
constituencies
out
of
the
224
and
this
itlself
has
generated
so
much
drama
because
there
are
indications
that
the
party
may
return
to
power
in
the
state.
Karnataka
Pradesh
Congress
Committee
(KPCC)
president
Dr.
G.
Parameshwara
said
that
leaders
making
such
charges
will
be
asked
to
appear
before
the
panel.
There were more than 2,400 aspirants for the Congress tickets.
Demonstrations in front of the KPCC Bhavan in Bangalore by candidates lobbying for tickets have become common. The "overlooking" of candidates in key constituencies has apparently irked them.
Yesterday, the Karnataka High Court ordered an emergent notices to Congress President Sonia Gandhi and Parameshwara on a petition seeking a probe into alleged collection of funds from party members seeking tickets for the Assembly polls.
Justice Abdul Nazeer ordered issue of notices also to the Election Commission and state Chief Electoral Officer on the plea by V Shashidhar, who, claiming to be a Congress worker and a ticket aspirant, alleged Rs 10,000 each had been collected from such aspirants.
The petitioner's advocate, G R Mohan, prayed for a writ of mandamus to EC to formulate proper guidelines and procedures to prevent funds collection for the polls by political parties, specially Congress president and PCC chief.
"They have no authority of law to collect a sum of Rs 10,000 from each of its members for the Assembly elections 2013. The total amount collected from about 2,500 members, may be more than Rs two crore," the petitioner claimed.
The counsel submitted that the petitioner, along with other applicants for the assembly tickets, were required to pay Rs 10,000 each for the constituency from where they wished to contest as "party fund".
The petitioner had remitted the sum by demand draft for which a receipt was issued by the KPCC president, he said.
With PTI inputs