Representatives of various groups who were opposed to the visit had already withdrawn their proposed protest last night following assurance by local police and administration but when they came to know that the organisers announced cancellation today, they expressed satisfaction.
"We welcome the move because it is related with religious sentiments of all the Muslims," Mohammad Salim, National Secretary of Jamat-e-Islami Hind, said here.
"We were against the particular author not against the festival. We see Rushdie as a criminal from religious point of view because he wrote objectionable things about our Prophet. Freedom of expression does not give right to write or say anything as Rushdie did," he said.
"As far as the intelligence inputs are concerned, we doubt it. I take it as mere a drama by the author," he said.
"We had planned peaceful but unprecedented mass protests against his visit but of course anti-social elements sometime try to create disturbances and we did not want anything like that to happen so we apprised the organisers as well as the local administration about our apprehension yesterday," he said.
Mohammad Nazimuddin, another representative said that they had planned peaceful protests.
Nazimuddin said, "protests were certain and inevitable because it is not a personal matter, it is the matter of the entire community. None would like to hear anything about his religious prophet so is the reason of our protest."
He also claimed that various muslim groups had planned joint and peaceful protests.
"Now we are happy that the visit of Rushdie has been cancelled," he said.
Festival organisers read out a statement by the Booker Prize winning author, which said, "For several days I have made no public comments on this issue at the request of local authorities hoping that they would put in place arrangements to allow me to come and speak."
"But I have been informed by intelligence sources in Maharashtra and Rajasthan that paid assassins from Mumbai underworld might be on their way to eliminate me.While I have doubts about these intelligence inputs, it would be irresponsible for me to come and endanger the life of fellow authors and others," the author said.