Hazare's associates Arvind Kejriwal, Shanti Bhushan, Prashant Bhushan and Kiran Bedi met senior BJP leaders L K Advani, Arun Jaitley, Sushma Swaraj and Nitin Gadkari for over three hours explaining their version of the Lokpal Bill and gave "clarifications" on aspects over which the Opposition party had "doubts".
"We discussed how a solution could be found while preserving the prestige of Parliament and Constitution," Jaitley told reporters later.
He said the civil society representatives agreed that a solution should be in consonance with the Constitution, he said, adding the rest depends on whether the government has a "positive" and constructive" approach.
If government "sincerely" approaches the issue, a solution should not be difficult, the BJP leader said. He said the Hazare team had given clarifications to the BJP leaders on various aspects over which they had "doubts".
Regarding questions over whether Prime Minister should be brought under the purview of Lokpal, Jaitley said the BJP had clarified its position on July 4 that he should be included. With regard to higher judiciary, he said the BJP favoured a separate commission.
The team Hazare said while they were waiting for government's response on its demands, the main Opposition "broadly agreed" with their version of the anti-graft legislation.
Prashant Bhushan said he hoped that the resolution to be moved in Lok Sabha tomorrow would be "clear" enough and would include the three vital issues raised by them so that Hazare could end his fast.
On meeting with BJP leaders, Kejriwal said, "it appears, they agreed on almost all aspects of the Jan Lokpal Bill." With regard to higher judiciary, he said the Hazare team had no objection to bringing of separate Judicial Accountability Bill and setting up Judicial Accountability Commission.
Bhushan said the Commission should be independent of the judiciary and government and have powers to investigate corruption in judiciary which is not provided for in the government's present bill. The present bill only deals with misconduct within judiciary and riddled with conflict of interest, he said.