Click it and Unblock the Notifications
Just In
Don't Miss
-
Add These 18 Foods To Your Daily Diet To Increase Your Sperm Count And Boost Male Fertility -
IIT JEE Advanced Registration Date Out for Indian Nationals, Check Out the Details Here -
HUL Q4 Results Preview: Price Cuts Likely To Impact Topline Growth, Shares Gain 1.88% In 1-Week -
Deepak Parambol And Aparna Das Tie The Knot At Guruvayur Temple! Check Out The Wedding Glimpses! -
Honda Amaze Scores 2-Star Safety Rating At Global NCAP Crash Tests – Next-Gen Model To Arrive In 2025 -
ONE Friday Fights 60: Start Time, Card, Telecast & Live Streaming Details -
Vivo T3x 5G Goes on Sale in India at 12 noon Today via Flipkart: Check Price, Specs, Offers -
Kurnool's Hidden Gems: A Guide To Exploring India's Lesser-Known Treasures
Nepal's judgment was biased against Sobhraj: UN
Kathmandu, Aug 5: The UN committee had given Nepal six months' time to take necessary action in Charles Sobhraj case and stated that the court did not deliver unbiased justice to him.
Seven years after remaining behind bars in Nepal for the alleged murder of an American tourist, Nepali courts had rejected Sobhraj's 'not guilty' plea on Jul 30.
Nepal had taken Sobhraj's passport by applying immigration law in 1975 but the law had been implemented in the country in 1990s.
"No one shall be held guilty of any criminal offence on account of any act which did not constitute a criminal offence in the time when it was committed," said UN committee.
According to the UN agency, the trial was heavily biased against Sobhraj.
It also added, "most hearings were cancelled or postponed at the last minute without reasons being provided. The length of proceedings and high number of postponements and cancellations can't be justified."
"Right of access to courts and tribunals and equality before them must be available to all individuals, regardless of nationality and status," said UN.
OneIndia News
