Mehtas' cannot abort 24-week old baby: Bombay HC
Mumbai,
Aug
3:
The
Bombay
High
Court
on
Monday,
Aug
4
disallowed
abortion
of
24-week
old
baby
of
Mehta
couple.
HC
said
that
there
is
no
evidence
that
child
will
be
born
handicapped.
There
is
no
suffecient
evidence
to
support
the
abortion
plea.
Petitioners
didn't
say
the
case
is
exceptional,
Court
added.
Niketa
Mehta
challenged
the
Indian
Penal
code
to
take
a
fresh
look
at
it's
37-year-old
abortion
control
law
by
filing
a
case
seeking
abortion
of
her
24
week
old
foetus
as
it
has
a
congenital
heart
disease.
Niketa Mehta Case
Niketa Mehta is 24 weeks pregnant but she wants to abort because the foetus has been diagnosed with a congenital heart problem. According to the law, pregnancy cannot be terminated after the twentieth week unless there is a health risk for the mother.
“I am firm that I don't want this baby because the baby will suffer after the birth. My suffering and my family's suffering is another story," says Niketa.
Doctors say the probability of the foetus surviving nine months is very low and even if the child is born he or she will have to be fitted with a pacemaker, which will have to be replaced after every four years.
However, medical experts are of the opinion that by doing so Niketa is also putting herself at risk in the process.
Governement run JJ hospital filed it's report on the foetus condition to the court. According to the Indian law, Niketa was expected to have had the abortion before she entered her 20th week of pregnancy. But Niketa is seeking to change the very existing law saying that she could not risk the life of her child.
The government hospital in its earlier report to the Court had said that there is a fairly good chance that the child will be born incapacitated and handicapped. But on Monday, Aug 4, the hospital contradicted the same. The initial report also added that the Sonogram shows that Niketa's foetus has a complete heart blockage with low ventricular rate.
The foetus also has a major artery that is dispositioned, however the report did mention that there was no other damage to the heart that is yet visible. And barring any other such anamolies the child can have a normal life with a pacemaker in childhood which has to be replaced in adulthood.
OneIndia News