Washington, Mar 30 : While people argue about the ideal marriageable age for youngsters, a new study has suggested that getting married or living together and having children is beneficial for some young adults.
The study, led by Alan Booth, distinguished professor of sociology, human development and demography, conflicts people's tendency to encourage youngsters to complete their education and postpone marriage and children to achieve more rewarding lifestyles.
"In industrial countries, young people age 18 to 25 are expected to explore their identity, work and love by delaying marriage and parenthood. It is believed that those individuals who fail to postpone these family transitions miss out on better career opportunities, make poor choices on partners, and may experience problems," said Booth.
"However, our research has shown that early family choices may be a productive option for many young adults, especially those who are disadvantaged with respect to family income, parental education and structure, mother-child relationship, verbal ability, school attachment and delinquent behaviour," he added.
For the study, the researchers examined the family and personal characteristics of more than 8,000 young adults who participated in the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health (Add Health).
They observed that over a five-year period half of the sample made an early family transition and half did not. Later they compared the depressive symptoms of those who made a transition with those who did not, and found very few differences in depressive symptoms between the two groups.
"The only exception was women who experienced a breakup of their live-in relationship. They were more likely to see an increase in depression compared to women who did not break up with the live-in partner or did not make a transition," noted Booth.
However, just 14 percent of those who made a transition belonged to this category. The researchers selected depressive symptoms as a measure of wellbeing because they are linked to many types of adversity such as poor physical health, unemployment and harsh family relationships, and apply to males and females and people of all ages.
"The findings are even more remarkable when we take into account that young adults who transitioned into early families were more likely to come from low-income families, had parents with lower levels of education and likely lived in a household with one or no biological parents," said Booth.
In families with low-income, teens may experience a disruptive home environment and parents with poor parenting skills. The study stated that if they leave to live together, marry or have children, it might provide an opportunity to escape from an unloving home and create a more positive family.
Booth added that the difference between men and women on early family transitions and protective family factors requires more study.
"Most research on emerging adulthood has been on college students. Our study highlights the importance of study early family transitions in context, in light of the range of opportunities open to a person. Post-high school experiences of young adults are more diverse than popular belief, and early co-habitation or marriage and parenting may be productive for many young people, at least over the short haul," he said.
The team's findings were published in a recent (February) issue of the Journal of Marriage and Family.