''The injustices of history and their long shadows must be eliminated from current determination of policy,'' he added. Earlier, in the opening session of the three-day conference, organised by the Centre for National Renaissance, New Delhi, in collaboration with the Fairbank Center, Harvard University, the Institute for International Studies, Tsinghua University, China, and SCMS, Kochi, Janata Party President Subramanian Swamy said he did not think that the US was trying to use India as a counter-weight to China.
In view of their bilateral trade-relations, neither the US nor China would like to take any differences to flash point, he added.
However, Prof John Garver, of the Georgia Tech University, US, said both US and China were looking forward to enlisting India on their side as a counter against the other.
''India is at present in an advantageous position of being in the middle of the India-US-China triangle and it will have to use skillful diplomacy to handle its relations with the two countries,'' he added.
Chief Editor of The Hindu, N Ram, however, challenged the concept of a ''triangle'' between the three countries and said there was no need to ''over-interpret'' the current international configuration.
He said China's support for a permanent UN Security Council seat for India and its openness to civilian nuclear cooperation were the two incremental benefits from Prime Minister Manmohan Singh's recent visit to China.
However, he felt that there would be no early resolution to the border dispute between the two countries as ''neither the UPA nor the NDA would be able to politically sell a final border settlement to the people of the country,'' he added.
Air Chief Marshal (Retd) S Krishnaswamy, who is a member of the National Security Board of India, said the country could not go slow on its ''capability building'' in Defence, especially in view of the border dispute and a host of Defence-related projects launched by China.