Normalcy process has begun in Nandigram- Karat
New Delhi, Nov 12 (UNI) The CPI (M) today held the Trinamool Congress and the Maoists responsible for creating a" disturbing and abnormal' situation in Nandigram in West Bengal, and stated that no state government could allow a "parallel raj" and claimed that the process of restoration of normalcy and tranquility had already begun there.
" With the CRPF, the police and the civil administration reaching out to all areas in Nandigram today, normalcy will return in the coming days, the development work taken up and the democratic functioning of the local bodies resumed," party General Secretary Prakash Karat told mediapersons at the end of the Polit Bureau two-day meet.
Briefing on the PB deliberations, while answering a volley of questions regarding the party line on Nandigram, Mr Karat emphasised that the political forces which brought Nandigram to such a sorry state of affairs knew very well that they could not be dislodged democratically.
"We are not going to oblige them. The situation of utter lawlessness prevailed and bunkers were built and landmines laid. In this entire period starting from January 7, as many as 27 CPI(M) workers and supporters were killed.
Such a situation can not be tolerated by any state government or administration," said Mr Karat.
Answering a specific query whether he admitted about the state government's inability to maintain law and order there, the CPI(M) General Secretary maintained that the Trinamool supported by the Maoists created a "disturbing and abnormal' situation in Nandigram with the result as many 1500 people were forced to flee in the five panchayats of the area.
He said gang up of political forces against the CPI(M) and the Left operating in the guise of Bhumi Ucchhed Pratirodh Samiti virtually set up a parallel raj in the area.
Mr
Karat
also
quoted
Prime
Minister
Manmohan
Singh
having
said
recently
that
the
Maoists
have
become
the
greatest
challenge
to
internal
security
and
refused
to
agree
to
the
comparision
of
Nandigram
violence
to
that
of
the
Gujarat
2002
post-Godhra
violence.''
How
can
we
compare
the
two.
In
Gujarat
the
minorities
was
attacked
while
in
Nandigram
the
political
forces
opposed
to
the
CPI(M)
seiged
the
whole
area
on
the
pretext
of
protection
of
land."
" Who
has
recently
killed
the
security
personnel
in
Jharkhand
and
Chhattisgarh,''
the
CPI(M)
leader
questioned.
He
added
that
it
is
a
wrong
contention
that
the
violence
flowed
from
the
CPI(M)
cadres."
They
did
not
allow
us
even
to
conduct
the
Pulse
Polio
programme."
On
a
question
relating
to
the
"
left
divide"
in
West
Bengal
with
the
RSP,
Forward
Bloc
and
the
CPI
blaming
the
CPI(M)
and
the
Trinamool
for
the
Nandigram
episode,
Mr
Karat
quipped,"
It
is
true
that
the
CPI(M)
being
the
largest
group
in
the
LF,
it
is
our
responsibility
to
sort
out
the
problem
if
there
is
any.
But
it
must
be
reciprocated
by
the
other
Left
partners.
They
too
should
help
contributing
towards
Left
unity."
On
the
West
Bengal
Governor's
role,
the
CPI(M)
leader
said
they
had
already
made
their
viewpoint
known."
This
is
not
confined
to
Mr
Gopal
Krishna
Gandhi,
it
applies
to
the
institution
of
the
Governor
that
he
or
she
can
communicate
views
or
confide
in
the
state
and
central
governments,
but
should
not
go
to
public.''
UNI